Here is a thought from a book that I have been reading over the last few months, actually a little better then the last few months. The premise is whether or not that the whole premise of evolutionary science is in error. If it is then it is reasonable to assume that creation by God in only 6 literal 24 hour days is the only alternative. The title of this book is Genetic Entropy & The Mystery of the Genome

“Modern thinking centers around the premise that man is just the product of pointless natural process—undirected evolution. This very widely taught doctrine, when taken to its logical conclusion, leads us to believe that we are just meaningless “’bags of molecules’”, and in the last analysis—nothing matters.”

The main problem here is the question of whether man even maters in any sense at all. What kind of argument with this basic belief can be made that man has any moral undergirding. The problem really gives a rise to the idea that God does not exist and there fore man must account for the subject of how things came to be. However, if man is derived from 6 days of literal creation, then man becomes answerable to the God of Creation. This God of Creation is none other then the Lord Jesus Christ: “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. (John 1:3), indeed He is the one who created the world and every thing in it that we enjoy today.

The evolutionist really believes that: “The Primary Axiom is that man is merely the product of random mutations plus natural selection.”, that is man is the result of infinite mutations in a closed system, plus natural selection. If the world is the result of the theory of evolution, then there is no God, but this fails to account for the sheer volume of living things we have today. Not only that it also is just not possible when one considers that there is no evidence of it occurring today at the human genome level.